[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#269727: marked as done (Software RAID: mkinitrd.conf - mdadm or raidtools2 option)



Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:45:03 +0200
with message-id <20050428174503.GE32121@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#269727: Software RAID: mkinitrd.conf - mdadm or raidtools2 option
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2004 06:51:21 +0000
>From ilian@david.bg Thu Sep 02 23:51:21 2004
Return-path: <ilian@david.bg>
Received: from kz-gw.david.bg (office.kz.david.bg) [213.91.189.33] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C37ur-0000xB-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:51:21 -0700
Received: (qmail 16364 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 06:51:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jsoft) (193.68.150.13)
  by debian.localnet with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 06:51:19 -0000
Message-ID: <00c501c49182$5a0576a0$0d9644c1@localnet>
Reply-To: "Ilian Jovchev" <ilian@david.bg>
From: "Ilian Jovchev" <ilian@david.bg>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Software RAID: mkinitrd.conf - mdadm or raidtools2 option
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:50:51 +0300
Organization: DAVID Holding Co.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.74
Severity: normal

Hi,

I found folowing passage in mkinitrd manual.
{CUT}
If  both  mdadm(8)  and raidtools2 are installed, the former is preferred.
At the moment, mkinitrd uses the -D option of  mdadm(8) to discover the
constituent devices.  This means that only devices that are part of the
array at the  time  that  mkinitrd is run will be used later on.  This
problem does not exist when raidtools2 is used.
{CUT}

In my opinion, good benefit for will give an option in mkinitrd.conf, which
configure what tool is used to mount root md device (for compatibility by
default, that should be mdadm).

Versions of RAID tools packages:
ii  mdadm                     1.6.0-3
ii  raidtools2                 1.00.3-12.2


                                     Best Regards: Ilian Jovchev


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269727-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 17:45:05 +0000
>From max@stro.at Thu Apr 28 10:45:05 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DRD4T-0005ZE-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:45:05 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
	by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BC25C00C
	for <269727-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:45:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRD4R-0000pE-6t
	for 269727-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:45:03 +0200
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:45:03 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 269727-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#269727: Software RAID: mkinitrd.conf - mdadm or raidtools2 option
Message-ID: <20050428174503.GE32121@sputnik.stro.at>
References: <00c501c49182$5a0576a0$0d9644c1@localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00c501c49182$5a0576a0$0d9644c1@localnet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 269727-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004, Ilian Jovchev wrote:

> I found folowing passage in mkinitrd manual.
> {CUT}
> If  both  mdadm(8)  and raidtools2 are installed, the former is preferred.
> At the moment, mkinitrd uses the -D option of  mdadm(8) to discover the
> constituent devices.  This means that only devices that are part of the
> array at the  time  that  mkinitrd is run will be used later on.  This
> problem does not exist when raidtools2 is used.
> {CUT}
> 
> In my opinion, good benefit for will give an option in mkinitrd.conf, which
> configure what tool is used to mount root md device (for compatibility by
> default, that should be mdadm).
> 
> Versions of RAID tools packages:
> ii  mdadm                     1.6.0-3
> ii  raidtools2                 1.00.3-12.2

current mdadm version in testing conflicts against raidtools2,
so anyway it's not possible to be in the situation to choose
between both via the mkinitrd.conf

--
maks



Reply to: