[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#306382: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Changelog missing the change log entries)



Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:46:12 +0200
with message-id <20050426164612.GE27086@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#306382: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Changelog missing the change log entries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:23:19 +0000
>From dexter@debian.org Tue Apr 26 01:23:19 2005
Return-path: <dexter@debian.org>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DQLLi-00065i-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:23:18 -0700
Received: from granat.internetia.pl (ginger.netia.net.pl) [195.114.173.177] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DQLLh-0002Cy-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:23:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Piotr Roszatycki <dexter@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Changelog missing the change log entries
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DQLLh-0002Cy-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	OUR_MTA_MSGID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: minor

The last changelog says:

kernel-image-2.6.11-i386 (2.6.11-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Build against 2.6.11-3 (Andres Salomon).

-- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>  Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:20:01 -0400
 

I *really* would like to know, what has changed in this release, without digging
google or Internet for searching the "2.6.11-3"...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils                     5.2.1-2    The GNU file management utilities 
ii  initrd-tools                  0.1.78     tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools             3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 16:46:14 +0000
>From max@stro.at Tue Apr 26 09:46:14 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DQTCQ-0007Nk-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:46:14 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
	by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641F45C011;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:46:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DQTCO-0002sW-Bm; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:46:12 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:46:12 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 306382-done@bugs.debian.org, Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#306382: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Changelog missing the change log entries
Message-ID: <20050426164612.GE27086@sputnik.stro.at>
References: <[🔎] E1DQLLh-0002Cy-00@master.debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.61.0504261029110.1346@bobcat> <[🔎] 200504261749.51210.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200504261749.51210.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 306382-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:

> On Tuesday 26 of April 2005 16:36, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > I *really* would like to know, what has changed in this release, without
> > > digging google or Internet for searching the "2.6.11-3"...
> >
> > These days all the kernel patches go into the kernel-source package, and
> > kernel-image packages are built using it. Traditionally the kernel-image
> > changelog contains only changes to the kernel-image packages, such as
> > changes in configuration options and build procedure, etc. For the
> > information about what patches were added removed, you have to look into
> > the kernel-source changelog [0], and that's 2.6.11-3 Andres was referring
> > to. I can see your point, but it is unlikely that anything will/can be
> > done about it in the near future.
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I'm afraid it doesn't work with aptitude and apt-listchanges, so the real 
> entries shoud be in this package. Just now the changelog is almost useless.

for now you are able to look up the changelogs at 
changelog.debian.net for example:
http://changelog.debian.net/kernel-source-2.6.8

anyway the item we are discussing here is post sarge.
it will be solved once the kernel-images are
directly built out of the kernel-source.
yes the current level of indirection seems strange,
but not so long ago all different archs had no common
repository and separeted sources.

no need to keep that up. there for closing.
--
maks



Reply to: