Bug#278887: initrd-tools: way to find if you are on a megaraid2 or a megaraid
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Followup-For: Bug #278887
Hi, I just read planetDebian and I saw Joey Hess's message about
megaraid / megaraid2.
I have a Dell which uses megaraid and another which uses megaraid2.
Here is a way to find on which system your are :
on megaraid2 system :
# cat /proc/megaraid/hba0/config
v2.10.8.2-RH1 (Release Date: Mon Jul 26 12:15:51 EDT 2004)
PERC 4e/Si
Controller Type: 438/466/467/471/493/518/520/531/532
Controller Supports 40 Logical Drives
Controller capable of 64-bit memory addressing
Controller using 64-bit memory addressing
Base = f8848000, Irq = 38, Initial Logical Drives = 1, Channels = 1
Version =513O:H418, DRAM = 256Mb
Controller Queue Depth = 254, Driver Queue Depth = 126
support_ext_cdb = 1
support_random_del = 1
boot_ldrv_enabled = 1
boot_ldrv = 0
boot_pdrv_enabled = 0
boot_pdrv_ch = 0
boot_pdrv_tgt = 0
quiescent = 0
has_cluster = 0
Module Parameters:
max_cmd_per_lun = 63
max_sectors_per_io = 128
On megaraid system, I have :
# cat /proc/megaraid/0/config
PERC 4/Di
Controller Type: 438/466/467/471/493
Controller Supports 40 Logical Drives
Controller / Driver uses 64 bit memory addressing
Base = f883e000, Irq = 18, Logical Drives = 1, Channels = 2
Version =412W:H406, DRAM = 128Mb
Controller Queue Depth = 254, Driver Queue Depth = 126
Maybe these infos can be used to find the right module.
Thanks for your work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii cpio 2.5-1.2 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii cramfsprogs 1.1-6 Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F
ii dash 0.5.2-2 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii util-linux 2.12p-3 Miscellaneous system utilities
-- no debconf information
--
Thomas
Reply to: