[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please remove old kernel-source packages



Hi,

I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have
an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to
speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal.
Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be
removed.

There is also a need to update misdn-kernel which has
a Build-Depends-Indep on kernel-tree-2.6.9.

I have tried to CC all interested parties so they can say yay or nay.

I have spoken to AJ and he said he would be happy to act on this
list if we can make it complete. 

Source: kernel-image-sparc-2.2
Maintainer: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Ack: Josh Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Files:
  kernel-image-2.2.25-sun4cdm_9.1_sparc.deb
  kernel-image-2.2.25-sun4dm-smp_9.1_sparc.deb
  kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9.1.dsc
  kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9.1.tar.gz
  kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9woody1.dsc
  kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9woody1.tar.gz

Source: kernel-source-2.6.9
Maintainer: Kernel Tream
Uploaders: Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net> et al.
Ack: Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>, Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>,
     Dan Frazier <dannf@debian.org>
Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64
Maintainer: Kernel Team
Uploader: Frederik Schueler <fschueler@gmx.net>
Ack: none
Files:
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-generic_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-9_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-generic_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.dsc
 kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.tar.gz

Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64
Maintainer: Dan Frazier <dannf@debian.org> (Kernel Team)
Ack: Dan Frazier <dannf@debian.org>
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-itanium-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-itanium_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-mckinley-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-mckinley_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-headers-2.6.9-2_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-2-itanium-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-2-itanium_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-2-mckinley-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-2-mckinley_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb
 kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64_2.6.9-4.dsc
 kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64_2.6.9-4.tar.gz

Source: kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa
Maintainer: Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
Ack: none
 kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1.dsc
 kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1.tar.gz
 kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1_all.deb

Source: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9
Maintainer: Kernel Team
Uploaders Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>, Jens Schmalzing <jensen@debian.org>
Ack: Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>
Files:
  kernel-build-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-build-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-build-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-build-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-headers-2.6.9_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb
  kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-4.dsc
  kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-4.tar.gz


Packages that need Updating
===========================
Source: misdn-kernel
Reason: Bui8ld-Depends-Indep on kernel-tree-2.6.9
Maintainer: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
Ack: None

-- 
Horms



Reply to: