Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either
> fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it
> has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not
> replaced here. As a result, I am not able to determine myself if
> 2.6.10 is also susceptible, but instead hope you can determine this.
I think so too, it does not seem to have been applied upstream at all.
Do you want to ping LKML and find out if there is a reason why?
In the mean time I will go ahead and add it to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10.
As for 2.4.27, i am not sure either. I will investigate further and
report back.
--
Horms
Reply to: