[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#293844: marked as done (aic7xxx problem with DDS4 tape)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:54:30 +0100
with message-id <BE322346.C9E4%sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
and subject line <aucun objet>
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 10:20:27 +0000
>From sleclerc@actionweb.fr Sun Feb 06 02:20:27 2005
Return-path: <sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
Received: from antispam2.actionweb.fr [62.210.166.5] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CxjWk-00026Q-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 02:20:26 -0800
Received: from aweb-dev.actionweb.fr ([82.67.159.142]:56542 helo=[192.168.61.101])
	 by antispam2.actionweb.fr with esmtp   (Exim 4.34 #1 (EximConfig 2.0))
	 id 1CxjWg-0003lk-Ko   
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 11:20:22 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 11:19:51 +0100
Subject: aic7xxx problem with DDS4 tape
From: Stephane Leclerc <sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
To: Bug Debian <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-ID: <BE2BADD7.C86C%sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-EximConfig: v2.0 on antispam2.actionweb.fr (http://www.jcdigita.com/eximconfig)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.67.159.142
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sleclerc@actionweb.fr
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

package: kernel-source-2.6.8
version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: normal

Hi!

I upgraded the Sarge box with Kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp (-12) from Sarge.
And I now get fatar error with afio.

I'm using tob + afio. Backup are done using DDS4 tape. When error occurs,
AIC7xxx drivers crash and need to be unloaded/reloaded.

<snip>
etc/X11/xkb/types/basic.z -- (43%)
etc/X11/xkb/types/cancel.z -- (77%)
etc/X11/xkb/types/caps.z -- (16%)
afio: "/dev/st0" [offset 9m+784k+0]: Fatal error:
afio: "/dev/st0": Input/output error
 Fatal tob error: backup command failed.
<snip>

Afio stop on fatal error not alway on the same file.

I was previously using a 2.4.20 kernel. I tried with AIC7xxx drivers in
kernel module or hard coded (with a hand made compiled kernel). Same result.

I've not yet found how to locate the problem and how to solve it.

As well, I tried with a fresh tape and I have the same problem on two
servers upgraded at the same time.

Stef...



In dmesg:

(scsi18:A:6): 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 32)
  Vendor: ARCHIVE   Model: Python 06408-XXX  Rev: 9100
  Type:   Sequential-Access                  ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi18, channel 0, id 6, lun 0
st0: try direct i/o: yes (alignment 512 B), max page reachable by HBA
1048575
st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
st0: Error with sense data: Current st0: sense key Hardware Error
Additional sense: Internal target failure
st0: Error with sense data: Current st0: sense key Hardware Error
Additional sense: Internal target failure
st0: Error on write filemark.
st0: Error with sense data: Current st0: sense key Hardware Error
Additional sense: Internal target failure

scsi_mod              127908  5 aic7xxx,sr_mod,st,sd_mod,megaraid

...............................................................
.  Linux - Debian - php4 - JAVA/Tomcat - MySQL - Infogerance  .
.     email: info@actionweb.fr - http://www.actionweb.fr/     .
.      Tel: (0)141 906 100    -    Fax: (0)141 906 101        .
...............................................................



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293844-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 07:55:11 +0000
>From sleclerc@actionweb.fr Thu Feb 10 23:55:11 2005
Return-path: <sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
Received: from antispam2.actionweb.fr [62.210.166.5] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CzVdv-00052S-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:55:11 -0800
Received: from aweb-dev.actionweb.fr ([82.67.159.142]:64983 helo=[192.168.61.101])
	 by antispam2.actionweb.fr with esmtp   (Exim 4.34 #1 (EximConfig 2.0))
	 id 1CzVds-0001Si-98   
	for <293844-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:55:08 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:54:30 +0100
Subject: <aucun objet>
From: Stephane Leclerc <sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
To: <293844-done@bugs.debian.org>
Message-ID: <BE322346.C9E4%sleclerc@actionweb.fr>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-EximConfig: v2.0 on antispam2.actionweb.fr (http://www.jcdigita.com/eximconfig)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.67.159.142
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sleclerc@actionweb.fr
Delivered-To: 293844-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

package: kernel-source-2.6.8
version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: normal

This bug can be closed.

The problem seems related to kernel-source-2.6.8-12. I no longer have the
problem with version -13.

Stef...


...............................................................
.  Linux - Debian - php4 - JAVA/Tomcat - MySQL - Infogerance  .
.     email: info@actionweb.fr - http://www.actionweb.fr/     .
.      Tel: (0)141 906 100    -    Fax: (0)141 906 101        .
...............................................................




Reply to: