[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#275874: a tmpfs can be mounted even if not supported by the kernel



Horms wrote:
tags 275874 +patch
tags 275874 +pending
thanks

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:

reopen 275874
reassign 275874 kernel-source-2.6.9
retitle 275874 a tmpfs can be mounted even if not supported by the kernel
thanks

I have no plan to work around such a kernel bug (and I can't see what I
could do anyway). tmpfs is compiled by default in debian kernels and its
need is documented in README.Debian.
I'm reassigning this bug to the debian kernel package, so it can be
properly fixed.


The mysterious Chiaki-bug, eh.

The patch looks good to me and I notice that it has been included
upstream. I will put it into SVN and it should appear in the
next kernel-source-2.6.9 release.

Thanks to all involved


Thank you for your help.

Yes, now I understand that coping with this from userland
is almost impossible as mentioned by Marco d'Itri.

I hope that Debian's release of 2.6.9 (should Debian decide to
release 2.6.9.) incorporates this and other critical bug fixes.

One of these days, because of the quick 2.6.x series releases
to fix bugs and incorporate features (in my eyes), you may be better
off waiting for 2.6.10, and then 2.6.12, and 2.6.14, etc..

Those early odd numbered and even numbered minor release number
lost the meaning for distribution maintainers, eh?


--
int main(void){int j=2003;/*(c)2003 cishikawa. */
char t[] ="<CI> @abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.,\n\"";
char *i ="g>qtCIuqivb,gCwe\np@.ietCIuqi\"tqkvv is>dnamz";
while(*i)((j+=strchr(t,*i++)-(int)t),(j%=sizeof t-1),
(putchar(t[j])));return 0;}/* under GPL */



Reply to: