[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: state of 2.6.9



On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:45:03PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 12:12 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 10:43:35AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > 
> > > Of course.  One of the main reasons I want to push 2.6.9 out there is to
> > > see what bugs it fixes for people.  We'll then have a better idea of what
> > > to backport, versus simply looking through bk and hoping what's been
> > > committed is correct and will help more than it hurts.
> > 
> > That is true, though it will also mean there are less people discovering
> > problems in 2.6.8.
> > 
> 
> I disagree; 2.6.8 has been in the archive for a while, I think most of
> the bugs in it (major ones, anyways) are known about already.  Plus,
> 2.6.9 will only be in sid, while a great many people are running and
> installing sarge.

Point taken.

-- 
Horms



Reply to: