Andres Salomon wrote: > Given d-i's memory requirements, and the fact that you'd be hard-pressed > to find a (desktop) 386 system with more than 16 megs of memory, I don't > consider debian 3.1 to be a viable candidate for installing onto a 386. > Also, note that if we do drop 386 support, I will rename > kernel-image-2.6.8-386 to kernel-image-2.6.8-486, and update > optimizations accordingly. I have no opinion on 386 support, but it's too late to go changing kernel package names for sarge. d-i relies on the current names, and this sort of transition will likely set us back days or weeks on our release schedule. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature