Re: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_powerpc.changes UNACCEPT
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power4_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
>
>
> ===
>
> Despite being ACCEPTed, this package failed the database sanity checks
> at the time of install. This should only happen rarely and in
> corner-cases (a binary upload of a package which has since been
> melanie'd for example), so no code to do the necessary unaccept
> actions has been written. These actions (e.g. bug reopening,
> announcement rescinding, etc.) will have to be done by hand. Also,
> the files have been left in the accepted directory; please deal with
> them as well.
Hey, what is this craziness ? The new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9 package where
rebuilt and had those metapackages removed, so that we can get the 2.6.8
packages in which fix assorted security updates, and now you are rejecting it
because it contains packages that where removed ? I am baffled. But then maybe
the changes file was generated wrongly and still mentions them, even if they
are not build ?
Oh well, waiting for more info on this ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: