[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#282827: marked as done (incorrect processor speed detection )



Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:01 +0900
with message-id <20041126084600.GI15305@verge.net.au>
and subject line Bug#282827: incorrect processor speed detection
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 19:13:11 +0000
>From deetee@diversity-radio.net Wed Nov 24 11:13:11 2004
Return-path: <deetee@diversity-radio.net>
Received: from karl.serve.com [65.23.159.194] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CX2Zi-0002hp-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:13:11 -0800
Received: by karl.serve.com (Postfix, from userid 12357)
	id F00423756F; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:58:15 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by karl.serve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E904013F0A
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:58:15 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:58:15 -0700 (MST)
From: dee <deetee@diversity-radio.net>
X-X-Sender: jdennett@karl
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: incorrect processor speed detection  
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0411241148030.2829@karl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel
Version: 2.4.25

I am running debian kernel 2.4.25 (in the form of demudi:
2.4.25-1-multimedia-686) on a toshiba portege 7140CT laptop

I am having a strange and very impeding issue which is that on boot the
processor is sometimes misdiagnosed at a slower speed (and then my machine
really does run slower!)

So right now:
Detected 258.913 MHz processor.

and previously
Detected 497.570 MHz processor.
(which would be about right)

also I've had a 381MHz detection.

I've googled a bit, and have concluded that whilst it could be the bios
settings relating to battery power-saving modes it is _not_ this
because
i) the BIOS battery setting is set to proceesor speed=high
ii) this problem doesn't seem to be related to being disconnected from
AC power. Right now at 259MHz for example, I'm on the mains (& was at
boot)

I would be happy to provide more information and run diagnostics

I was not aware of this having happened with earlier kernels (eg 2.4.18,
2.4.20, but it _may_ have been that i missed this ??) Alternatively maybe
my hardware is just being flaky... as I said I'm happy to try to diagnose,
but will need some pointers.

(this message has also gone to debian-laptop and debian-users but as yet i
have had no replies, I am thus reporting a bug, as I can't find anything
else related on google.)

thanks
dee
----

Other info:
libc6: 2.3.2.ds1-13

more info from dmesg:

Initializing CPU#0
Detected 258.913 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
Calibrating delay loop... 504.62 BogoMIPS
Memory: 122900k/130944k available (1218k kernel code, 7656k reserved, 504k
data, 100k init, 0k highmem)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Inode cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Buffer cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
Page-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
CPU:     After generic, caps: 0383f9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: 0383f9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
CPU:     After generic, caps: 0383f9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: 0383f9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 01
per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 731.56 usecs.
SMP motherboard not detected.
Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282827-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 08:53:18 +0000
>From horms@koto.vergenet.net Fri Nov 26 00:53:18 2004
Return-path: <horms@koto.vergenet.net>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CXbqv-0001PE-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:53:18 -0800
Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by uid 7100); 26 Nov 2004 08:37:45 -0000
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:46:01 +0900
From: Horms <horms@debian.org>
To: dee <deetee@diversity-radio.net>, 282827-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#282827: incorrect processor speed detection
Message-ID: <20041126084600.GI15305@verge.net.au>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0411241148030.2829@karl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0411241148030.2829@karl>
X-Cluestick: seven
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 282827-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:58:15AM -0700, dee wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Version: 2.4.25

I don't believe that there is a 2.4.25 kernel currently supported by
Debian. Could you please try with 2.4.27?

-- 
Horms



Reply to: