[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#249510: acknowledged by developer (selinux in debian kernel)



On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:14:20PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> it's not a severe performance penalty.
> 
> especially when it's disabled by default with "selinux=0".

Yes, all the indirect calls due to CONFIG_SECURITY are a performance
penalty.




Reply to: