[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug #273456: kernel-package: implicit rules for unpatching don't reverse list of patches



[Sending this to -submitter so Josh will see it and the bug won't get two
copies; it is nevertheless addressed to the package maintainer.]

[I am not subscribed to -kernel; please CC me on replies.]

Manoj,

I have applied Josh's patch locally and it resolves the problem I was
seeing.

A log of a successful build to contrast with the one that failed can be
found here:

http://redwald.deadbeast.net/tmp/successful_build_log_for_joshk_and_svenl.bz2

Thanks, Josh!  Now, with luck, my box will use all of its RAM instead of
only half.  A reboot will tell me.

Oh yeah -- Manoj, since this bug in kernel-package causes stock Debian
kernel packages (like kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27) to FTBFS, should it be
considered release critical?  In fact I guess I'll Cc debian-kernel for
opinions on this.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    belly laugh.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: