Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de): > > > swusp isn't really stable enough yet. Maybe for sarge+1 > > > > I wasn't hoping this for sarge, don't be afraid..:-) > > Just for the record, I prepared inofficial kernel-image packages of > 2.6.8 with swsusp compiled in... > > deb > http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/i386/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 >/ ./ > > As I wrote, inofficial, so don't use the Debian BTS to report bugs. > > Norbert swsusp in current mainline kernel is incompatible with initrd for what I know, which, I think, is a reason why it can't be a part of official debian kernel ATM. However swsusp has recently added support for initrd and besides that is a lot more robust and featureful than swsusp in vanilla. It is vurrently in the process of being merged into the mainline. I would really hope that it could go into Debian kernels in the near future. Is that possible? Fedor.
Attachment:
pgpecyTKbPj3J.pgp
Description: PGP signature