Re: Dealing with 2.4 bugreports that are fixed in 2.6 only
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christoph Hellwig <email@example.com> [2004-06-27 17:29]:
> > There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and
> > are unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217).
> > How should we deal with them in the BTS?
> Is there any chance of those fixes being backported to 2.4 and how
> much work would it be? It seems that you guys have all given up on
> 2.4 completely, but I'd imagine that the majority of our users will
> still use 2.4 for a while.
The majority of our users will use what sarge provides as default.
Backporting the above changes is possible, but non-trivial, and it's
RFE's anyway, not bugs in the strict sense.
> This is really related to some other postings in this thread: are we
> ready to move to 2.6 by default?
Only looking from the upstream kernel POV:
mainline seems to work for atari and m68k with small patches
AFAICS. some subarchitectures seems to be lagging behind badly
(even worse than in 2.4)
upstream 2.6 works nicely on maybe subarches but badly or not
at all on some others.
seems to be fine in general but IIRC some features are still
for non-embedded plattforms 2.6 is ok, embedded plattforms are
still catching up
no SMP support on 2.6 yet, and AFAIK only sun4c/m works reliable
ok, Andi Kleen said x86_64 in 2.4 is in deep maintaince mode