Bug#257038: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: Does not mount HFS+ volume
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:07:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686
> > >
> > > 192:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hdc5 /mnt
> > > mount: Not a directory
> > >
> > > the same thing with mount /dev/hdc /mnt
> > >
> > > I can mount /dev/hdc5 /mnt but it is mounted only hfs, so the hfs+
> > > filesystem is not visible.
> >
> > Well, hfs and hfs+ are two separate modules, are you sure both of them
> > are compiled or loadable/loaded for your kernel ?
> I guess they are in the standard kernel. If they were not the message
> should be different.
Well, look in /boot/config-2.6.6-1-686 or something such, grep for
HFSPLUS.
> > Also, what kind of hfs+ filesystem you have ? Maybe it is lacking
> > compatibility or something, is it journaled maybe ? Or perhaps there is
> > an endianess problem in the hfs+ driver ?
> I have no idea what kind of filesytem it is. It was created by OS X,
> probably 10.0 or 10.1. hfs_fsck from 10.1 compiled for Linux does work
> on it.
Mmm.
> > Did this work with a 2.4 kernel ? Have you tested the userland hfstools ?
> The userland hfstools cannot work sice they only understand hfs.
>
> The other tools for hfsplus do not work. They can identify the
> filesystem and "mount" it but they cannot perform anything on it.
>
> I installed a 2.4 kernel and it can mount the partition and I see some
> reasonable content on it. But it cannot mount my partitions specified in
Some reasonable content ? Is all there, or are some parts missing ?
> fstab, I can only boot it with init=/bin/sh.
Huh ? You are trying to boot on a hfsplus filesystem ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: