Re: Debian kernel: various issues to discuss
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:25:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:59:41 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org> said:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:21:42AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't care much, not being particularly familiar with either arch
> >> or svn. If you ask me, it's cvs, but that has become unfashionable
> >> of late.
> >>
>
> > svn is cvs with steroids. It has the advantage of being quite smooth
> > in upgrading from cvs for the mean developer. AFAIK arch is
> > under-documented and quite difficult to use in respect with
> > subversion.
>
> I find that not to be the case. There is a very nice tutorial
> that walks one through setting up archives in arch; and I find arch
> far easier to use than CVS; but I am not sure how that would compare
> to subversion.
Oh well, so it's time to give it a try for me :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: