Re: Re: Debian kernel maintainter takeover
Adam Majer wrote:
>Anyway, bitkeeper or CVS would just be for kernel developers, and not for the
>end user.
Please don't use bitkeeper exclusively; you don't want to exclude people from
developing kernel packaging just because they work on (e.g.) subversion or
arch development.
>As to the non-free binary blobs, these are to be moved to non-free. There
>should be an automatic 'non-free removal patches' (not part of the actual
>debian source).
To follow the X Strike Force model (which seems to work) I suggest a
'prune-non-free' script, which should be shipped in the debian/ directory of
the source package .diff for convenience. This script would convert an
upstream source tree to a 'debian-clean' source tree.
Reply to: