[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Testing : do not upgrade to 5.21 (yet)



Erwan David ha scritto:
> 
> -------- Message d'origine --------
> De : Luigi Toscano [mailto:luigi.toscano@tiscali.it]
> Envoyé : lundi 23 août 2021 à 10:50 UTC+2
> Pour : Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>, Debian Kde <debian-kde@lists.debian.org>
> Objet : Testing : do not upgrade to 5.21 (yet)
> 
>> Erwan David ha scritto:
>>> After upgrade to 5.21 this morning (plasma-workspace 4:5.21.5-3), I get
>>>
>>> kf.plasma.core:
>>> "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/plasma/applets/org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so"
>>>
>>> : this plugin is compiled against incompatible Plasma version 348928 This
>>> build is compatible with 5 .0.0 ( 327680 ) to 5.78.0 ( 347708 )
>>> kf.plasma.core: Applet "org.kde.plasma.systemtray" could not be loaded.
>>>
>>> So better wait for a newer version...
>>>
>>
>> plasma-workspace alone is not Plasma. You need all the packages which makes up
>> Plasma, those are the upstream sources
>> https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/5.21.5/
>>
>> Please also consider that Frameworks is only partially migrated to testing,
>> which means other stuff may not work for different reasons than not having all
>> Plasma bits.
>>
> 
> I know; There were more than 400 packages, however error message is
> kf.plasma.core:
> "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/plasma/applets/org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so"
> : this plugin is compiled against incompatible Plasma version 348928 This
> build is compatible with 5 .0.0 ( 327680 ) to 5.78.0 ( 347708 )
> 
> and according to apt-file  org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so comes in
> plasma-workspace package.
> 
> See bug #992760
> 

You have a mix of Frameworks packages from 5.78 and 5.83:

ii  libkf5plasma5                                 5.78.0-3
ii  libkf5plasmaquick5                            5.78.0-3
ii  libkf5prison5                                 5.83.0-2

Make sure you fully get all Frameworks 5.83 (which should be upgraded as a
single block).


-- 
Luigi


Reply to: