[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wheezy Security Support

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:43:53 +0200
Markus Raab <usenet@markus-raab.org> wrote:

Hello Markus,

>Is this true? "No security support upstream and backports not feasible"
>is double negated, so actually it says there must be a security support?

It's not a double negative, but two separate negatives (that's the way
I read it):

1) (there is) No security support upstream.
2) Backports (are) not feasible.

Perhaps it could have been phrased better to avoid confusion.

 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Sign away your life
Tin Soldiers - Stiff Little Fingers

Attachment: pgpHas0b47I61.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: