On Friday 05 March 2010 19:17:28 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > If I were to rebuild digikam for KDE 4.4.1 SC, which version string should > I use? 2:1.1.0-1 as in unstable or 3:1.1.0-1 or what? I just ask in case > anyone else wanted this, for my local installation I do not care that > much. A package of digikam rebuilt against experimental-snapshots is available at: http://people.debian.org/~msp I will upload this fixed digikam to experimental once KDE 4.4.1 his experimental. Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.