Re: Akonadi not starting
On Monday 13 April 2009, email@example.com wrote:
> It even explains that akonadi DB use 100M
> by default, then grow ...
I noticed that somewhere, too .. 100MB *per user*, mind. Entirely
unsure how this will scale up for organisations who like to keep
databases away from edge machines. I got the impression this
was 100MB per database, but I'm not sure how much saving we
get with multiple users on one DB instance.
Weird (and unsettling) that the web page you mention talks about
'problems with users running mbox and maildir' .. as I went down
the path of flipping back to mbox for a number of my mailing list
folders, just because the syncing of umpteen thousands of messages
was killing the machine during my backup cycle. If this system can't
cope (and given it just caches stuff on the way in, I don't see what
it has to actually cope with here) with the two most common types
of mail storage structures .. it doesn't bode well.