On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:16:57AM -0600, kosh wrote: > On Monday 06 October 2003 09:19, Antiphon wrote: > > > It is bad practice that the Debian listservs do not munge addresses. I > > realise that munging may not be implemented because people like to be able > > to respond to old threads privately but simply providing a mechanism as > > simple as spelling out domain suffixes and removing at signs would do the > > job nicely. > > I disagree with this idea and I don't want the addresses munged. It is very > useful being able to reply to someone and I will just hit reply to reply to > someone. If the mail bounces I won't waste any more time contacting them. > Overall not one list that I am on munges email addresses and when people do > it to their own addresses they often end up getting no help at all. I see > that on the python and zope lists a fair bit. Also how would munging help anyway when you have the unmunged addresses easily available at: http://groups.google.com/groups?group=linux.debian.maint.kde Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature