[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kshowmail with KDE 3.1.2



On Sunday 01 June 2003 06:47, CRH wrote:
> Has anyone successfully compiled kshowmail http://sourceforge.net/projects/kshowmail/
> with KDE 3.1.2? 
> 
> I am unable and I don't know whether it's incompatibility with KDE 3.1 or
> compiler issues. Below are the make errors.

Install libmimelib1-dev

Achim
> 
> 
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:21:28: mimelib/mimepp.h: No such file or directory
> decodeRFC2047.cpp: In function `QCString decodeQuotedPrintable(const QCString&)
>    ':
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:40: error: `DwString' undeclared (first use this function)
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>    for each function it appears in.)
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:40: error: parse error before `(' token
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:43: error: `dwsrc' undeclared (first use this function)
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:43: error: `dwdest' undeclared (first use this function)
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:43: error: `DwDecodeQuotedPrintable' undeclared (first use
>    this function)
> decodeRFC2047.cpp: In function `QCString decodeBase64(const QCString&)':
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:54: error: parse error before `(' token
> decodeRFC2047.cpp:58: error: `DwDecodeBase64' undeclared (first use this
>    function)
> make[2]: *** [decodeRFC2047.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/craig/downloads/kshowmail-3.0.4/kshowmail-3.0.4/kshowmail'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/craig/downloads/kshowmail-3.0.4/kshowmail-3.0.4'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ciao,
> CRH
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com



Reply to: