[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Thinking of trying out the KDE 3.2 CVS packages.

Any advantages/disadvantages to doing it this way (with Konstruct) instead
of using the CVS debs from http://opendoorsoftware.com/cgi/http.pl?p=kdecvs
Just wondering which one would be easier to switch from when KDE leaves beta
as far as maintaining settings and such?

-----Original Message-----
From: Antiphon [mailto:antiphon99@yahoo.ca] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:02 PM
To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Thinking of trying out the KDE 3.2 CVS packages.

No need to not give in! You can run both versions of KDE on a single machine

by using the very accessible Konstruct application. You can even set it up
use a different .kde directory as well. To uninstall, all you have to do is 
delete the package directory and the source directory.


On Monday 03 November 2003 03:15 pm, Doug Holland wrote:
> On Sun 02 Nov 2003 7:07 pm, Antiphon wrote:
> > Most things are relatively stable though Konqueror will crash
> > occasionally, esp. on sites with Flash or Java so turn those off if you
> > want stability. Even though things in general run faster, Orth's debs do
> > not have the debugging options turned off so there will be some slowdown
> > there.
> >
> > The new KMail is the biggest improvement IMO. Finally the threading
> > works." and IMAP is improved.
> >
> > For some apps, you won't be able to go back to your old .kde settings so
> > make sure and back it up if you ever want to go back.
> And now the KDE 3.2 beta is out.  The bells and whistles doth tempt me. :D
> Doug

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Reply to: