[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

qwindowstyle.h problem



Hi,

I write also to Martin Loschwitz as the maintainer of the package. 
First I have to say that I have looked the README.Debian....
I'm trying to compile an library (SoQt). I think that the last week compiled 
with the libqt3-mt-dev from ktown, but now I cannot know which version 
exactly (I'm in the work, and I have the copy at home)

I have an error 
qwindowsstyle.h: No such file or directory

 I have read that there's some differences about headers .... bla, bla. I have 
looked on the web 
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.1/qwindowsstyle.html#details

and I think that it's a valid header for the 3.1 version. 

I know that it's a "Microsoft Windows-like look and feel" but I don't think 
that it's a reason to not include it. ;-)

I have found also something about 
-----------------------------------------
Q: I have an application that when linking gives me symbol referencing
errors to Q*Style. Why does my applicationnot link correctly ?

A: The author of the program is using the styles that ship with Qt directly
instead of using the QStylePlugin interface.If you are the author of the
program, change your program to use QStylePlugin. If you are a packager,
write to theauthor of the program that he is assuming that the styles
shipped with Qt are built-in to the library which is not the case on Debian
and that he please should fix this and use QStylePlugin.
--------------------------------------------

but I understand that it's something about the linking, but not the compile. 

However I have found in the web this:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200210/msg00771.html

So I understand that the debian qt version has the Styles as plugins. But, why 
do not put the include file? It's in the qt3.1 version. Maybe will have some 
compatibility problem with others distros. No?.

Well, I just ask, I wouldn't like a flame. I follow the README and I contact 
with the author of the applications.

Regards,

Leo










Reply to: