Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:03:27 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030227010327.GB485@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-kde@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030227001120.GO903@phobos.fs.tum.de>
References: <[🔎] 200302270016.54058.bab@debian.org> <[🔎] 200302262008.24459.nolden@kde.org> <[🔎] 20030226221516.GA24646@gluck.debian.org> <[🔎] 200302262344.58883.nolden@kde.org> <[🔎] 20030227001120.GO903@phobos.fs.tum.de>

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:11:20AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:

> E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), are you root?

Exactly.  Remember that bit in the social contract about these "users"?

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ralf Nolden <nolden@kde.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ralf Nolden <nolden@kde.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Next by Date: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Next by thread: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread