[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: trouble installing kde-3.0.5 on woody



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Freitag, 22. November 2002 22:26 schrieb Jeff Keller:
> > 2. The link for latest has recently been updated to point to 3.0.5,
> > but there is no Debian directory under 3.0.5.  Wouldn't it make more
> > sense to organize the directories as, e.g.:
> >         Debian/woody/<version>/
> > rather than
> >         <version>/Debian/woody/
> > to avoid this problem?
>
> Maybe he or someone else addressed the first problem with an update
> and the second with a band-aid?

Yes, looks like.

> In any case, is a directory re-org of that sort feasible?

No. download.kde.org is kde-version based. From the view of KDE, first there 
are the different versions then there are precompiled packages for different 
systems. The view might differ on a debian server but it is completely right 
for the project server.

> On a more general note, I get the impression that the woody port of
> KDE-3 is neither widely used nor thoroughly maintained, and I suspect
> a chicken-and-egg problem.  Can I induce a maintainer to try harder to
> break that cycle?  I'm happy to throw some money at the problem if it
> will help.  (I believe that having a reliable, easy-to-install,
> current port of KDE for the stable version of Debian is valuable to
> both projects.)

Something is wrong with your setup. Just today, I upgraded KDE2.2.2->KDE3.0.4 
by using the source above. The right libqt3(-mt) was installed and it ran 
just fine (even _without_ removing KDE2.2.2 first). And else it is a pure 
woody system...

Hendrik

- -- 
Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de
        oder über pgp.net

PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE93rK7zvr6q9zCwcERAqL8AJ9BsVv7zG4eH6RUN/HEOY5XRrjebgCgu9Bk
Jk+eIO5UqAmDWYx7GqbdnE4=
=m6br
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: