[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kppp scripts



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Saturday 24 March 2001 12:16, paul taylor wrote something to this effect:
> The local computer store got the ISP script by using hyper-terminal in
> windows. (the ISP refused). I have the login,
> Now the pppd deamon dies. there is a reference to a www.kde.org/~kppp.html
> page which does not exist. and a general error message.
>
> To get kppp to work I gave permissions out wholesale.
> I now get a meta key error that the whole world can look in. I have no idea
> what this is.
>
> I also can't shutdown any more. the system hangs and the power has to be
> turned off. the system that is not supposed to crash has done so in fact.
>
> kppp does not work and has ruined all dial up for me. this is not ideal.

Paul,

	How often do you need to call up 'different' isp's? If you use just one, use
the autoppp features. If you'de like, I'll send you a copy of my files. Work
nicely for me until I got broadband access. A number of the servers I've
built/customized have this installed and working well.

Regards,


- --
______________________________________________________________________________
                           OutCast Computer Consultants of Central Oregon
                                 http://outcast-consultants.redmond.or.us
                                 griz@outcast-consultants.redmond.or.us
                                                 (541) 504-1388
                                 Via IRC at; 205.227.115.251:6667:#OutCasts
                                           Via ICQ: UIN 138930

"Failure is not an option...it's bundled with Microsoft"
						-anonymous-
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: Np0HsEy5K22i1Fwu44V+JTwvmC2T9PEz

iQA/AwUBOr1YXQhnWicv+0tKEQLXfACgulS8zXSs7y2LNbF0bdXdSaPnLvkAnjg2
h4NMJTjQe6cYvE2GPoJMgr1A
=cNiA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: