On 09/11/2013 12:52 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I think an "objective classification" what games are suitable for which kids > is doomed to fail. These questions are way to subjective IMO. I disagree. If you have tags that state the *intended* age range for software (as defined by upstream) that's an objective classification. That is, "upstream targets the software at ages __ to __". You can argue all day whether upstream has chosen an appropriate target age range. What you can't argue with is that objectively, this is software targetted at these age ranges. Whether or not they successfully bracket the *actual* age range the software can be used with sounds like a good topic for a bug filed upstream for them to change their target age range. :) Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature