> My suggestion is that the current classification should be considered > "historic" and there is no point to keep it stalled. If you have > different requirements nothing that currently exists should be set into > stone but rather changed as needed. However, I'd recommend to put the > reasons for the changes down into some kind of documentation. Currently our packages lists are quite simple: a list for educational apps, one for work-related apps, one for multimedia apps and another one for games. This mimics the tabs of the application launcher in the most advanced activity of DoudouLinux. Then the interface of DoudouLinux is supposed to help parents lead their children to the applications matching their age since activities can be hidden whenever needed. If Debian Kids wants to be as close to DoudouLinux as possible, we may indeed not need to split packages sets along 2 axes, age and category. Note that there are additional packages lists in DoudouLinux for the base system, drivers, language-specific packages, live-specific tools, etc. > Just become a member of this change and feel free to propose a changed > set of tasks files. Of course, but I still have no clear idea about what would be the best! -- Cheers, JM.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part