Re: Debian Kids Camp for DebConf-next
- To: debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
- Cc: DebConf team <debconf-team@lists.debconf.org>, "Debian Jr. Project List" <debian-jr@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Debian Kids Camp for DebConf-next
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:26:15 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120718152615.GF15392@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <CAODfWeEt=06kDErBpx3=m7WxK=jahMzD+GEsVMFR4016_dk+kA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAODfWeHiFzsiS42JaopM4DTxx2wmB8T6j0Eqk6yRO4aPngAjAw@mail.gmail.com> <20120715015944.GD30122@sym.noone.org> <5002A305.9060209@debian.org> <CAODfWeFJxmjKz2WMJ4ipx-jwfVWPTXZVqmfi4fHVYYHU0oTC7w@mail.gmail.com> <20120715200628.GD18868@ftbfs.de> <87629ob8xh.fsf@meteor.durcheinandertal.bofh> <CAODfWeEt=06kDErBpx3=m7WxK=jahMzD+GEsVMFR4016_dk+kA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:42:35AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>
> Premises:
>
> 0. I do not think creating yet another mailing list, project,
> infrastructure, ... is really needed.
> 1. debian-jr@lists.debian.org, a.k.a.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-jr/, holds very low traffic.
> 2. debconf-team must need to coordinate in some aspects with
> debian-jr for debconf organization.
>
> Therefore, I propose:
>
> 0. Use mailing list listed in premises 1. to develop didactic
> methods to teach kids during a week parallel to DebConf, any needed
> software can be discussed and finally uploaded to Debian archive if
> needed for activities going on there. That might help to revive
> debian-jr project.
> 1. When approaching DebConf, debian-jr must coordinate with DebConf
> team, trying to avoid any overhead on DebConf team, DebConf kids camp
> status updates should be discussed in debconf-team, or announced in
> debconf-announce.
I like the plan even if "debian-jr must coordinate with DebConf team"
does not reflect the reality: Whoever steps into debian-jr *becomes*
debian-jr itself (because there does not seem to be any such thing like
debian-jr team any more). So if those people are DebConfIstas that's
perfectly fine and I would like this plan very much but it just would be
an internal coordination (as long as no new rush from outside would be
triggered).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: