Re: Moed Debian Jr. repository to Alioth
- To: Debian Junior <debian-jr@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Moed Debian Jr. repository to Alioth
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0704102128510.3302@wr-linux02>
- In-reply-to: <20070408182657.424f3eab@sanctuary.edennet>
- References: <20070408182657.424f3eab@sanctuary.edennet>
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[1] Although this seemed like a good idea at the time, for various
reasons I ended up sticking with the single metapackage per category
model Debian Jr. uses to this day.
What are these reasons and how can I help to invalidate them?
But I have retained this experiment
in the repository under
svn://svn.debian.org/debianjr/branches/EXP-cdd-dev in case we ever
reverse that decision.
I do not really care where the source of a project are located I
would regard it as very reasonable to at least leave a hint in the
CDD repository. I wonder whether I should stop the cdd-dev fun
having only for one single CDD while others seem to be happy to
develop their own stuff in parallel.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: