Re: Overview, roadmap, priorities
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Well, she likes logging into the console on the 486s. I don't think she
> judges programs based on their attractiveness. That was the revealing
> thing. It's not that the kids don't have X available to them, or that
> there's nothing interesting installed on X ... yet, I find that 99% of
> the time, she spends logged into a console session, either editing text
> files with a text editor, or using one of the three aforementioned
> programs.
OK, then let her play with the plain "wn". Using the command-line
options sanely will give her more fun than dict.
May be she will like it so much that she starts programming a
ncurses-based tool to wordnet which might become my favourite way
of accessing the wordnet database ;-).
> Hm. That might well suit someone out there. As for me, I have no great
> like for Harry Potter. But if you think it's worth pursuing, you could
> suggest it on the kidsgames list.
There is no doubt about different views on this book. But in fact I
havn't met a child which doesn't like the books after reading and
seldom met a child who hasn't read it :).
But its OT here to discuss - just a quick idea of mine.
> Since this is not a kid-specific area of development, perhaps it should be
> raised on debian-devel then. Perhaps we could attract some developers who
> have already thought through this problem and have ideas/time to
> contribute to our efforts?
Done. See my latest posting to debian-devel about "Hierarchy ...".
I'd like to avoid CCing here, but in case someone doesn't read -devel
ask me...
> Which brings us back to the packaging question. If Debian-Jr is going to
> focus first on packaging new things, how do we pick-and-choose amongst all
> of the possible things to package out there?
I think about packaging "SelfLinux" which is a quite clever introduction
to Linux in German (any translators) written by the people who also
did the tipptrainer.
> In the "programs to think with" area, I think I'd like to try my hand next
> at "glogo":
>
> http://laguna.fmedic.unam.mx/~daniel/glogo/
Sounds good.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Reply to: