Re: PR, artwork
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 08:27:36PM -0600, Pat Mahoney wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been (well, I just started :) messing around with a primary color
> > > (red blue yellow) theme with larger fonts for windowmaker.
> >
> > http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~pmahoney/debian-jr/
>
> Not a bad start. Of course the first thing that will change is the
> background color, as I don't think I've ever looked at the same color
> background on any two consecutive days on my daughter's desktop. If you
> want to preserve the three-color scheme, the blue should be worked into
> the theme somewhere other than just the background.
Hm... I was thinking that if they would change anything, they'd change
everything. There are undoubtedly much "cooler" themes than mine. I
tried to make a nice looking default for those who wouldn't change
(very young?). However, I've never seen a child try to use a computer;
I'm sure you are much better qualified than I am.
Also, if we want the webpage to match the theme, is this one ok or
would different color scheme etc be more desirable?
> > [1] I've got one idea in the making. How about a toy block with three
> > sides showing. The sides could have stuff like the swirl, the letters
> > J and R, maybe the words debian jr. We'll see. Perhaps the logo
> > should be language independent.
>
> Hm. I'm not sure if I were a 10-year-old I would want my OS logo to be a
> toy block. Something with broader appeal perhaps? The swirl by itself
> looks a bit ... stuffy. Maybe we could simply anthropomorphize the swirl
> and put it (him/her) into action? rough sketch:
[snip]
Ok, I see your point. But do you think we should ask other places
(debian-news) to contribute potential logos, or do you think we should
try to come up with someting internally? Is a "logo contest" a good
idea, or no?
--
Pat Mahoney <patmahoney@gmx.net>
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for
reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."
-- Albert Einstein
Reply to: