Le jeudi 31 juillet 2025, 22:30:11 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Vladimir Petko a écrit : > Hi, > > As far as I remember, 20230707 removes the circular dependency that > caused upgrade issues[1][2][3]. It also requires openjdk to trigger > ca-certificates-java: > ----JB-jre-headless.postinst.in---- > # Now that java is fully registered and configured, > # call update-ca-certificates-java > dpkg-trigger update-ca-certificates-java > ------ > Please check that this snippet is present in bullseye's > JB-jre-headless.postinst.in of openjdk package. No it is not, so that it the path to fix this ? 1. first upload a openjdk that trigger update-ca-certificates-java 2. upload a backport of ca-certificates-java 3. upload ca-certificates rouca > > Best Regards, > Vladimir. > > [1] > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2003750 > [2] > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1999103 > [3] > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2004061 > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 1:14 AM Julien Plissonneau Duquène > > <sre4ever@free.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I can't help you much there as I didn't check what could break in your > > case (bullseye). The last time this was discussed on the list was > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2023/02/msg00011.html > > > > According to the PT in bullseye it depends on default-jre-headless which > > depends on openjdk-11-jre-headless which depends on > > ca-certificates-java, but I don't see how updating it could cause > > issues. > > > > Maybe Emmanuel or doko could share more details about what could go > > wrong? > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.