Re: OpenJDK package - JTREG 7.1
Hi,
I see. I will look into those failures to see if it is something that
I can submit upstream, so that jtreg 5 could be phased out.
Thanks a lot for the help again !!!!!!!
Best Regards,
Valdimir.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:11 AM Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>
> >Regarding using jtreg6 for tests of openjdk-8 it should be noted that
> >some tier1[1] tests fail with jtreg6.
>
> Lots of tests fail there anyway, also due to lack of asmtools.
>
> >For instance jtreg 6 fails:
> […]
> >and with jreg 5 those tests pass:
> […]
> >There are more instances like this and if it is of interest I can
> >provide a full comparison.
>
> Might be useful to pass that on to the 8u developers.
> I won’t be doing anything with it and the ELTS people
> are mostly interested in comparing test results against
> the previous upload’s, to see that nothing broke too badly.
> If upstream makes their tests jtreg6 compatible all the better.
>
> >Would it be possible to consider keeping jtreg 5 version around in
>
> No, we’re targetting jessie and stretch with openjdk-8 mostly,
> which lacks jtreg 5 and where the backported jtreg6 really
> helps, without, we had to disable the tests entirely.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
> Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
> Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
> HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
>
> ****************************************************
> /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
> ╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
> ╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
> ╱ ╲ header encryption!
> ****************************************************
Reply to: