Re: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy
- From: Alexandre Rossi <niol@zincube.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:40:32 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] YjrO8PQGhDJHsFRc@zincube.net>
- In-reply-to: <ee42c298-7279-c663-c000-71f8ab54a7a3@debian.org>
- References: <4cb1dbe5-2f12-3fc3-efef-9c8b491fb3df@debian.org> <f802acefa2e553d83e83608f7ed361173602934b.camel@debian.org> <68a120c1-7779-8e79-3501-43ee135dd8c0@debian.org> <8e43321d-75e7-7731-ec27-b01c4c147a8c@apache.org> <YW0it8W9MoQ10Blq@zincube.net> <ee42c298-7279-c663-c000-71f8ab54a7a3@debian.org>
Hi,
> >>> Not sure though what is the impact of this policy inversion. Most of
> >>> Java-related software seems to read both regular files and symbolic
> >>> links transparently.
> >>
> >> There isn't much impact, both styles are fine in my opinion.
> >
> > This seems to trigger https://lintian.debian.org/tags/bad-jar-name
>
> Exactly. Thus lintian seems to follow the current Java policy and
> correctly emit warnings.
>
> I am trying to understand if this is a bug in maven-*-helper, or a
> result of overly strict policy. One of these should be changed.
I finally found some time to look into this and came up with a patch.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007923
Thanks,
Alex
Reply to: