[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#900124: ITP: libjavolution-java -- Java core library for real-time and embedded systems (Was: Re: What happened here?)



Am 26.05.2018 um 15:30 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Markus,
> 
> thanks for the explanation of the unusual commit - I keep on wondering
> why git claims me as the author of that changes.  Also git blame says
> I have created the patch ... hmmmm.

I have successfully built the package and imported it with
git-buildpackage but I didn't change your changelog entry. So your name
is listed as the committer. Gitlab is smart enough to show

" Andreas Tille Committed by Markus Koschany " though, hence it's clear
that the Koschany guy is responsible for the commit.

> Anyway, I have two remaining questions:
> 
>    1. I have set:
> 
>       Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net>
> 
>       since this is the real address of the new list.  In some unrelated
>       discussion it was decided that we stick to the old e-mail ID for the
>       maintainer in other projects.  Should I rather change to
> 
>       Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> 
>       ?

I would stick to the old address until the project finally agrees that
it is unwise to maintain those information in source packages. You can
also mix the addresses as you please to make a point or update all 1000+
Java packages so that the information are exactly the same, whatever is
more fun. ;)

>    2. I remember there was some way to add maven control information to
>       such library package.  I have found something that would fit[1].
>       Could you please refresh my mind and tell me where I should put
>       this to enable other depending packages grabbing the proper
>       information?

Do you mean a pom file? AFAICS there is already

/usr/share/maven-repo/org/javolution/javolution/6.0.0/javolution-6.0.0.pom

I don't think you need more information but I'm not sure if I understood
your question correctly.

Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: