Re: Bug#870258: GCC 7 related library transitions
On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They probably
>> need new upstream versions that support GCC 7. The only exception is libpam-script
>> build-depending on libgfortran3 for no apparent good reason. I filed #889876 for that.
>
> I filed bugs for these:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcc-6-rm
>
>> As for the GCJ removal, I crafted this list of binary packages. This is running
>> for sid, so it catches more stuff.
>
>> Some things here need to be updated to use openjdk or default-jdk, e.g. kamailio, pdftk, libidn...
>> Other things likely need to be removed since GCJ is no more, e.g. ant-gcj, ecj-gcj...
>
> And for these:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org;tag=gcj-rm
Please could you extend the latter with bug reports where
default-jdk/default-jre is going to away altogether because it's provided by
gcj? Things like db5.3 come to my mind ...
Matthias
Reply to: