Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?
- To: Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com>
- Cc: Debian Java <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?
- From: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:23:57 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] cfd01b1a-0d20-c788-8e96-bf4a65c54f1c@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAEjvcd8RQrgRemoZ0Kf8+kYTBR=ATrdsLv7UThfZUEG_1qx3qA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <878thoyqnz.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <CAEjvcd83TA8_f_daa8gy4oWBH5VzFJCt2PMEh3F0Rm4_xeZf5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEjvcd-mVm-rFO9qsGGjzAgtaGH-p7jVdWQ_L8omSBSeigyseA@mail.gmail.com> <87fubvvkdm.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <CAEjvcd_JuuHM3AoC0p6-ajHVsCf9iu7-Ye8yuDOUiT3m_DzFug@mail.gmail.com> <3cf85cf3-2667-12be-eaf6-cae7899927ad@debian.org> <CAEjvcd8RQrgRemoZ0Kf8+kYTBR=ATrdsLv7UThfZUEG_1qx3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 10.09.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Christopher Hoskin:
> Dear Markus,
>
> Thanks - that's useful to know.
>
> ratt -dry_run batik_1.9-1_source.changes 2> >(wc -l)
> 554
>
> Hmm, this could take a while... I guess it must be looking for
> recursive reverse build dependencies?
>
> Christopher
Yes, probably. I thought it was possible to control that but I haven't
used ratt in a while.
I have created a simple page, https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Rebuilds,
with some links and tips for rebuilding packages. If you find the
solution for this issue, just add it to the wiki.
Regards,
Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: