Re: Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

[Jerome <jerome@ibt.unam.mx>]

Dear Andreas.

I put here the results of the commands. Home that helps...

$ sudo update-binfmts --display jarwrapper
update-binfmts: warning: jarwrapper not in database of installed binary 
formats.
update-binfmts: exiting due to previous errors
$ sudo update-binfmts --display jar
update-binfmts: warning: jar not in database of installed binary formats.
update-binfmts: exiting due to previous errors


Thanks !

Regards

Le 06/05/2017 à 00:16, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:11:52AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and
> > binfmt-support.  IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of
> > this, but at the moment I cannot locate the details of that exchange.  It
> > was something along the lines of there being multiple interpreters
> > registered for the given binfmt.
>
> Thanks for ths info.
>
> > If we know that the user's kernel supports binfmt_misc, then we should be
> > able to figure out what's happening.  The output of "sudo update-binfmts
> > --display jarwrapper" (should point to jarwrapper) and "sudo update-binfmts
> > --display jar" (should point to jexec) might be informative.  I'll try to
> > reproduce locally and report back.
>
> I've reduced the severity of this bug from grave to important and have
> added the tag moreinfo.  Jerome, could you please provide the said info?
>
> Kind regards
>
>         Andreas.


--
-- Jérôme
L'oisiveté est, dit-on, la mère de tous les vices,
mais l'excès de travail est le père de toutes les soumissions.
     (Albert Jacquard)