[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue



Dear Andreas.

I put here the results of the commands. Home that helps...

$ sudo update-binfmts --display jarwrapper
update-binfmts: warning: jarwrapper not in database of installed binary formats.
update-binfmts: exiting due to previous errors
$ sudo update-binfmts --display jar
update-binfmts: warning: jar not in database of installed binary formats.
update-binfmts: exiting due to previous errors


Thanks !

Regards

Le 06/05/2017 à 00:16, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Tony,

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:11:52AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and
binfmt-support.  IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of
this, but at the moment I cannot locate the details of that exchange.  It
was something along the lines of there being multiple interpreters
registered for the given binfmt.

Thanks for ths info.

If we know that the user's kernel supports binfmt_misc, then we should be
able to figure out what's happening.  The output of "sudo update-binfmts
--display jarwrapper" (should point to jarwrapper) and "sudo update-binfmts
--display jar" (should point to jexec) might be informative.  I'll try to
reproduce locally and report back.

I've reduced the severity of this bug from grave to important and have
added the tag moreinfo.  Jerome, could you please provide the said info?

Kind regards

        Andreas.



--
-- Jérôme
L'oisiveté est, dit-on, la mère de tous les vices,
mais l'excès de travail est le père de toutes les soumissions.
     (Albert Jacquard)


Reply to: