Re: "Width (0) and height (0) must be non-zero occurred while creating cursor CopyDrop.32x32"
- To: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
- Cc: tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>, Debian Java List <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: "Width (0) and height (0) must be non-zero occurred while creating cursor CopyDrop.32x32"
- From: Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:38:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87shnytl6n.fsf@bitburger.home.felix>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701312205270.8331@tglase.lan.tarent.de> (Thorsten Glaser's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:07:36 +0100 (CET)")
- References: <87mve72leh.fsf@bitburger.home.felix> <20170131201934.ez7tlgipty46gslo@boson> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701312205270.8331@tglase.lan.tarent.de>
Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> writes:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, tony mancill wrote:
>
>> 5.x). At this point I think the behavior is isolated to VirtualBox.
>> However, I am not aware of a work-around.
>
> I’ve talked to a VirtualBox engineer (then Sun) at LinuxTag
> about emulation bugs related to BSD. He said they were aware
> of certain bugs, but as they don’t get paid to fix them, and
> their only targets to emulate correctly were Windows and Solaris,
> that’s all they care about. (It got so bad (also, users com‐
> plaining about the “bug”) the MirBSD installer now refuses
> operation under VirtualBox, although it seems to be slightly
> better if you have “hardware acceleration” enabled.)
>
> So, in short, I’d not care about bugs that only occur due
> to broken emulation.
Thank you both for confirming it's a virtualbox issue.
A workaround that seems ok is to switch the desktop environment:
I just switched from xfce4 to e17 and the problem is gone
(for a short amount of time?).
Otherwise: Which sid virtualization do you use for building/testing
packages?
I guess Xen would be very efficient. But is it a risk to run Xen (Dom0?)
on a production desktop machine? And I can run a "remote desktop" server
on a Xen instance to test GUI programs?
Cheers and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
Reply to: