Re: GCJ removed

To: Debian Java List <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: GCJ removed
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:39:40 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6E3tTMtEApkk8vjmzi+O6nemMTfMjWAd+A_4yJEZbS4Zw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+7wUsx8wqxfx7MTCr7afpVqRWxMO7Qy=h7ekbseDAki=_7gSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CA+7wUsx8wqxfx7MTCr7afpVqRWxMO7Qy=h7ekbseDAki=_7gSw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:

> I am starring at debian-devel@l.d.o and debian-java@l.d.o but see no
> discussion about gcj removal. Am I missing something or was this
> something known to everybody (porters mainly).

There were two threads on -devel and -java:

https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/70a9cb78-3cb2-af47-ea59-97efb00d8274@debian.org
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c5e790b5-88ce-e5c4-1cc3-f43fa7e2e2d3@debian.org

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- GCJ removed
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>

Prev by Date: GCJ removed
Next by Date: Re: GCJ removed
Previous by thread: GCJ removed
Next by thread: Re: GCJ removed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread