Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:16 +0000, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 08/12/15 12:01, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before
> > downloading I have to agree with this page:
> >
> > https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-for
> > m/
> >
> > In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to
> > package osgi in Debian. Am I right?
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> From the copyright notice you linked:
>
> "Implementation of certain elements of the OSGi Alliance
> Specification
> may be subject to third party intellectual property rights."
>
> The latter elements would need to be stripped out of the source
> tarball.
> Question is whether the software is still useful without these
> patented
> components.
Clarification from
https://twitter.com/nbartlett/status/705909830314299392
and the sources with the license
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.osgi/org.osgi.core/6.0.0
It's an Apache License 2.0.
Cheers
--
Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com>
Reply to: