Sorry, but do you have a better hint for me since my attempt below did
not change anything?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:44:20AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 16/02/2016 11:19, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >
> > > I wonder whether this might be a missing symlink or so inside
> > > openjdk-8-jdk?
> >
> > openjdk-8 changed some symlinks (see #760301). There is a make fragment
> > available in /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk defining the right include
> > option for the current JDK.
>
> In case you wanted to provide a hint to do
>
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index 86df809..57139da 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ export TESTCLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit4.jar:/usr/share/java/testng.jar:/usr/
>
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
> include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
> -
> +include /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk
>
> %:
> dh $@ --with javahelper
>
>
> I need to admit this does not change the situation. Any more precise
> hint?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Debian-med-packaging mailing list
Debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
Attachment:
libsis-jhdf5-java.patch
Description: Binary data