Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

To: Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:25:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5666CC50.8060200@apache.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5666C68E.9000308@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 5666C68E.9000308@gmail.com>

Le 8/12/2015 13:01, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit :

> Any thoughts?

As I understand this "license grant" covers the specification. The
implementation is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license (which includes
a handy patent protection clause).

Emmanuel Bourg

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
  - From: Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com>

References:
- Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
  - From: Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
Next by Date: Docker image to help debian-java
Previous by thread: Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
Next by thread: Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread