Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> wrote:
> On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>
> Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if there
> is no activity for a few days (on RC bugs),
> you can ask for a sponsor on the mailing list.
> However, since the bug is RC and open for a month, we could go faster here.
Ok. Would that not imply that someone would need to take the patch,
checkout the code, apply the patch and then prepare an upload? i.e.
what I've done whilst omitting the patch step. Forgive me if I'm
misunderstanding things.
There are many RC bugs in the Java team. I think there is a lack of
manpower so I was trying to help with that. Obviously I don't want to
create more work for people by not following the correct workflow so
I'm happy to be schooled.
>> In any case, regarding the description fields, I will check with him
>> as they are packages he created.
>>
> Don't hesitate to report a bug with a patch here.
>
Ok I will do that.
> Thanks,
> Sylvestre
>
Thanks
Stephen
Reply to: