[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts about jruby

On 08/31/2014 02:39 PM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2014, at 7:38 am, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
>> Source: jruby
>> Version: 1.5.6-7
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: jessie sid
>> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> This is a timely email as I’ve been looking at the possibility of packaging the latest very of jruby.  The archive version is 1.5 and the latest is 1.7, but with a maven (3?) based build system and the associated problems with that.
> Are there any thoughts in the community about jruby packaging or jruby in general?

Hi Tim,

I was looking into the same - that is, packaging 1.7, in time for jessie
if possible.

(And this may be less work than ironing out the issue with the
deprecated apt ant task anyway...)

If you have work/interest in this area, we could coordinate via a branch
in the packaging repo.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: