Re: eclipse-pydev packaging
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Thanks for the information! I will have a look at it this week end.
Regards,
Adrien
Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
>
> On 07/31/2014 08:19 PM, Adrien Grellier wrote:
>> I am interesting in having eclipse-pydev in Debian for jessie. I see that
>> someone is intented to package it:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636698
>>
>> Is it still the case ? If no one has time to do it, I may be able to
>> dedicated time to take care of it.
>
> thanks for your interest; it would be great if you could help, since I
> haven't had lately enough time to finish the packaging.
>
> Please have a look at the current progress in git [1]. To build the
> package you'll need jython 2.5.3-2 for which I've just sent a RFS so wait
> until it's uploaded. Otherwise I guess there shouldn't be any major
> obstacles. If you encounter some problem during compilation you're not
> sure how to solve, just ask.
>
> Once you're able to build the version that's in the git, you may try to
> update the package to the latest upstream, which is 3.6.0 at the moment.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakub
>
> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/eclipse-pydev.git
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=biWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: